A small method you can see.
The tool uses only the answers or text you enter. It shows the checks it uses, so you can disagree and make the final call.
You choose the answers and make the decision.Check seven things before spending Connects.
The tool does not read or rank jobs. You check seven facts and stay in control of the choice.
The tool uses only the answers or text you enter. It shows the checks it uses, so you can disagree and make the final call.
A tool can check structure. A person can understand context. Send us your goal when you want another set of eyes.
See free human help ↗The tool does not read or rank a job post. You answer seven yes-or-no checks. Each checked answer adds one point, while an unchecked safety item overrides the normal result.
Check the scope, client signals, timing, budget, and platform safety details.
Tick only statements you can support from the post, your proof, and your real capacity.
Use unchecked items to ask a question, investigate, or skip the job.
No mystery score. These are the rules the tool uses.
Result: The tool shows 6 of 7 and ‘Strong enough to consider,’ then lists the budget gap. It does not tell you to apply; it shows what still needs a real answer.
Example only. It is not a client result or a promise.No. Read the post and answer the seven checks yourself. No job data is sent to us.
A job can match your skills and still contain a serious warning sign. The override is a reminder to pause, not a formal fraud decision.
No. Six can be worth considering, and a lower score may reveal a question you can answer. Use the gaps, not the number alone.
No. It is one signal. New clients can be real, and established accounts can still post a poor-fit job.
Use a deeper fit review before you spend time and Connects.